Skip to main content

Comparison

Performate vs the k6 CLI

Performate uses the same k6 engine as the CLI. It does not replace k6. It is a Windows desktop workspace so requests, variables, scenarios, live metrics, and reports live in one place instead of a terminal-plus-spreadsheet loop.

When should I use Performate instead of only the k6 CLI?

CapabilityPerformatek6 CLI
EngineBundled k6; you do not install k6 separatelyYou install and version k6 yourself
Primary UIDesktop workspace (Windows)Terminal and your editor
Postman importFirst-class collection and environment importManual translation or a separate converter
ReportsIn-app dashboard plus shareable reportsstdout, JSON, or your own Grafana stack
AICopilot for scripts and run summaries (not autopilot)None built-in
CI/CDSame k6 tests; Pro+ aimed at pipelinesNative fit for GitHub Actions and similar

When to choose which

Choose Performate when you need

  • A desktop workspace for API/QA teams that already have Postman collections.
  • Live metrics and shareable reports without wiring exporters first.
  • k6 semantics without installing k6 as a separate toolchain step.

Choose the k6 CLI when you need

  • Full control of flags, cloud execution, or custom outputs from day one.
  • A script-only workflow with no desktop app.
  • Linux or macOS as the primary load-generator OS today (Performate is Windows-only).

Does Performate replace the k6 CLI?

No. k6 still executes the load. Performate is a workspace around that engine: import, scenarios, dashboards, and reports. You can still think in k6 scripts.

Can I take Performate tests into CI?

Yes on Pro+: the product is built to reuse the same k6-based tests in pipelines such as GitHub Actions. The CLI remains the execution model.

k6 scenario types guide · All comparisons · Download Performate